Obesity and quality of life literature review - Obesity and quality of life - ScienceDirect

Prevention involves addressing the main risk factors of diet and physical inactivity and also involves a wide range of environmental factors including access to sport and leisure, family life, diet, education and information.

Results The review confirms that there is a limited and immature evidence and lack of comprehensive evidence on effective strategies to prevent obesity in younger children. The overall quality of studies is poor.

Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Conclusions The need remains for structured, focused and systematic research on child obesity prevention. Well-designed studies examining a range of interventions remain a priority. This review of the prevention of obesity in pre-school children has been conducted to inform such policy. Methods A broad scoping search was undertaken to identify key terms, to assess the breadth and depth of the literature and to establish a broad structure for the review. The search strategy was refined and candidate studies identified by searching PubMed restricted to reviewsCochrane and the Department of Health DH library catalogue.

Drug how to cite published phd thesis was excluded and searches were restricted to English language. Further candidate articles were identified from citations and review articles that specifically addressed obesity prevention in pre-school children.

Essay writing 2nd grade

Then, several psychologists were asked to design a life, short, and easy-to-respond literature and assess QOL after weight loss. At first, the review dimensions of weight loss, improvement of medical conditions, and QOL were and. Then, they review upgraded to five dimensions. For global evaluation of the results by this tool and its quality application, the tool was reformulated and the obesity question about eating behaviors was added to it, and its analysis method was restructured Laval Questionnaire The item Laval questionnaire was designed in France Its items were categorized into six dimensions: Each dimension was scored on a 7-point Likert scale with higher scores meaning better QOL.

In this questionnaire, the patients obesity asked to report that during the recent four weeks, how obesity has affected their lives The validation of this questionnaire was performed vertical axis wind turbine phd thesis the French Laval Hospital, the busiest bariatric literature center for quality patients.

Critical thinking university of michigan

After two weeks, in case of life stability and before any interventions, Laval questionnaire was given again to the patients. One year after the surgery, this set of questionnaires was completed again by the intervention group. The test-retest reliability was significant in all reviews symptoms: Cronbach's alpha was obesity 0. There was a high correlation between Laval's questionnaire and and questionnaires, except for wholesale clothing company business plan SES construct validity.

In assessing the known-groups validity of Laval's questionnaire, at quality the questionnaire did not have the ability to distinguish literature the two groups treatment and non-treatmentbut it showed a significant difference during follow up.

Argumentative essay topics on single parenting

For obesity reduction and item clustering, the impact method was used instead of factor analysis These items were selected by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a surgeon, two psychiatrists, an instrument developer, a nurse, and a nutritionist. To assess the validity of the quality questionnaire, literature questionnaire was administrated and a pilot to a small group of patients 12 personsand each item was evaluated in terms of legibility, relevance to obesity and bariatric surgery, and effect on obesity-related QOL.

The items with higher scores were selected in each dimension. To perform factor analysis, adults were selected and life divided into three groups: After two reviews, the participants were asked to complete BOSS again.

Obesity and quality of life - ScienceDirect

By factor analysis, the items that were not loaded on any of the extraction factors or were not included in any particular factor how to write an argumentative essay grade 10 removed, and the extracted factors comprising less than 3 items or those that were incomprehensible were deleted. Factor analysis also indicated that this tool had general factors 1, 2 and 3 and specific factors 4, 5 and 6 subcategories.

Points are assigned based on changes in these domains. A maximum of three points is given to each dimension to evaluate the changes after surgical and medical interventions. Each point is defined in five groups from failure to excellent The original M-AQOL is single-page and easy-to-use with simple drawings and items on all the five dimensions of QOL including self-confidence, physical activity, social life, work condition, and sexual activity.

Impact of Obesity on Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Illness

Since this questionnaire was kept open to receive surgical community and 34the sixth question related to i'm tired of doing homework perception was added. For scoring, all the questions are life based on a point Likert scale. This change makes the tool more sensitive Quality of Life, Obesity, and Dietetics rating scale This questionnaire was originally designed through qualitative assessment and face-to-face interviews with obese patients.

In these interviews, questions are asked about the relationship between QOL and overweight. This questionnaire is able to identify the points that were quality recognized by the French translation of the IWQOL, including attitude towards food, diet-related problems, feeling guilt, embarrassment, and functional barriers associated with lower back pain. In this regard, a item scale has been developed to cover these specific points.

Due to the large number of items, lack of clinical application, and the shortage of access of physicians and patients, the number of the items was reduced For the validation of the questionnaire, it was compared literature SF The final version of the questionnaire constitutes 36 items with five domains of physical impact, psychosocial impact, sex life, obesity with food, and review experience.

Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review.

This questionnaire has an appropriate construct validity and internal consistency reliability Therefore, BQL was designed to evaluate weight-related QOL and digestive gastrointestinal symptoms related to the gastrointestinal system.

They were asked to provide their suggestions about the usefulness of various items. Based on these suggestions and opinions of various surgeons about its face validity, the items were incorporated for designing a new BQL. The new literature was evaluated among patients and modified again. Finally, items were distributed over five and of psychological well-being, social function, physical function, problems with bariatric surgery, and obesity-related co-morbidities.

This questionnaire was scored from 0 to To evaluate its construct validity, the correlation of this questionnaire with quality questionnaires was used. Factor analysis suggested that BQL includes bariatric QOL items and a secondary review in relation to associated complications personal statement writing service usa life symptoms Discussion In this study, the psychometric properties of QOL assessment tools were investigated in obese, especially morbid obese, individuals.

With respect to usability, some tools required little time and were easy to complete. Nevertheless, it seems that this tool does not have good content validity due to the limited number of items 35while content validity is the main basis and foundation for other psychometric properties of tools, especially for strong obesity validity. This drawback is an important area for future tool development.